Mobile: 10 predictions for 2013

Posted by Admin | Posted in



Verizon and HTC are just two companies that are expecting a busy 2013.
(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)
If nothing else, 2012 has shown that the mobile industry is a pretty tough business to be in.
Many handset manufacturers, wireless carriers, and component suppliers felt the pressures of mobile business sink in, and as a result, there were a lot of shake-ups this year.
The same pressures and competitive dynamics are expected to persist next year, so expect a lot more action. The following predictions are based on conversations with industry sources over the last few months, market trends, speculation, and a little wishful thinking.
One thing's for sure, the industry should keep us all on our toes in 2013.
Consolidation continues
The wireless industry has long talked about the need for fewer service providers, and 2013 should follow through on some of the groundwork laid this year. SoftBank's controlling stake in Sprint Nextel and T-Mobile USA's merger with MetroPCS may signal a long-anticipated industry consolidation.
Other regional carriers such as U.S. Cellular and prepaid provider Leap Wireless could be in someone's crosshairs. MetroPCS and Leap were long rumored to be dance partners, but that talk ceased when T-Mobile opted to form a new company with MetroPCS. But perhaps there's room for Leap on that bandwagon?
Sprint attempted to make a run at MetroPCS, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing made by MetroPCS. Sprint could make another run at MetroPCS, or perhaps go after Leap. The wireless business is a scale business, where bigger is better, so maybe Sprint looks elsewhere?
It's a safe bet that the big two, Verizon Wireless and AT&T, won't be making any major deals. Verizon just managed to get approval for its deal to acquire spectrum from the cable companies, while AT&T is likely still gun shy after regulators squashed its attempted takeover of T-Mobile last year. AT&T has been content to strike smaller deals and get those through the regulatory maze.
Steve Ballmer and HTC Windows Phone
CEO Steve Ballmer and the Windows Phone 8X from HTC.
(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)
No clear third OS emerges 
Next year sees a vicious battle for the so-called coveted No. 3 spot for mobile operating systems behind Google's Android and Apple's iOS.
The contenders are Microsoft's Windows Phone 8 and Research in Motion's BlackBerry 10. Both have expressed confidence that they have what it takes to be the third player in this increasingly crowded business. Windows Phone 8 benefits from an earlier launch and the coattails of the massive Windows 8 campaign from Microsoft. RIM, meanwhile, already boasts a large base of customers and will get a launch window all its own early next year.
Our call on this: nobody wins. Both will scrape by with just enough sales to warrant continuing, but neither will see spectacular performance.
While Microsoft is selling its Windows Phone 8 platform as part of a family of Windows 8 products, Windows 8 itself isn't off to a scintillating start, and that might slow adoption of the mobile OS.
BlackBerry 10, meanwhile, may get some traction with hardcore BlackBerry users who want an upgrade, but it'll take a while for RIM to convince other consumers to take another chance on the platform. While RIM likes to boast of its 80-million-strong customer base (now 79 million after the fiscal third quarter), many of those customers are using the more affordable BlackBerry 7 devices.
In addition, the dominance of Android and Apple make it extremely difficult for any third player to make inroads on the market.
RIM in store for a shake up
If BlackBerry 10 isn't a success out of the gate, expect to see some agitation within the investment community -- or what's left of it -- which has patiently held out hope for a turnaround. Investors don't have unlimited patience, and an early stumble could mean pressure on the company to shake things up.
That could mean anything from another change on top, although CEO Thorsten Heins has led the company with relatively far fewer mistakes than his predecessors, to a potential sale of the company. The company could make good on its push to license its BlackBerry 10 operating system to different industries.
Last year, I called for RIM to get taken out, and I won't be burned by that prediction again. RIM does survive, but it either a drastically reduced or transformed way.
Spectrum grab
It's amazing what a few deals will do to the state of a crisis, right? All of the industry's biggest players, including AT&T and Verizon Wireless, all claimed a looming spectrum crisis in justifying their respective deals. After Verizon got its cable spectrum, and AT&T scooped up a number of smaller businesses, the rhetoric has changed greatly. Even Sprint and T-Mobile are sounding a lot more optimistic about things.
But the companies do insist that they need more spectrum, or the airwaves used to carry cellular traffic like voice and data, and they will likely pursue further deals next year. Sprint bought spectrum from U.S. Cellular, likely a prelude of future spectrum swaps. Verizon is also selling off a swath of its spectrum as a condition to acquiring an alternative patch of spectrum from the cable providers, something that'll likely entice all companies, including T-Mobile to other smaller regional companies.
Dish Network, meanwhile, is sitting on a wealth of spectrum. The most likely scenario is that it sells to AT&T, but the company is considering dabbling in mobile video.
A new chairman of the Federal Communications Commission is expected to replace Julius Genachowski next year, but with President Obama back for a second term, the FCC's agenda and focus on spectrum shouldn't change too much.
Google gets more active in wireless service
Sound farfetched? Well, the recent rumors that Google met with Dish to talk about a new wireless service lends some credibility to this prediction.
And Google already has a wired business in Google Fiber. While the deployment is limited to one area, the fact that it exists shows the Internet search giant is willing to dabble in different projects.
Dish has slowly been amassing enough spectrum for a nationwide service of its own, and has made it clear it would like to build a network. But the business requires a lot of capital, and it's unclear whether Dish has the firepower to actually meet its goals. Enter Google, which has a lot of cash and technical resources.
This prediction is admittedly on a longer limb. It wouldn't be surprising if this never happened.

What does Sprint CEO Dan Hesse have in store for us next?
(Credit: Lynn La/CNET)
Softbank kick-starts Sprint
The infusion of $8 billion in additional capital should do wonders for Sprint's prospects in the wireless market. The company has been criticized for its slow deployment of 4G LTE, which has managed to avoid major cities while covering "key markets" such as Rome, Ga., and Rockford, Ill.
Well, the extra cash should get CEO Dan Hesse moving a lot quicker when it comes to its 4G LTE rollout, which lags behind AT&T and Verizon. Unlike AT&T, which at least has a relatively quick HSPA+ network for its phones, Sprint customers using the most high-end devices are stuck on the painfully slow 3G CDMA technology, since it dropped using its variant of 4G, WiMax, in favor of LTE.
Sprint should get a wider selection of smartphones thank to its relationship with SoftBank. If SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son is to be believed, Sprint will get even more competitive with pricing as it takes on its bigger rivals.
Higher focus on prepaid
Every carrier is going to rededicate itself to attacking the prepaid market, particularly with growth in the contract subscriber market quickly evaporating.
T-Mobile, which already has a sizable prepaid business, should only see its presence grow there once it joins up with MetroPCS, which only offers no-contract plans. CEO John Legere's hints at a "different experience" for its iPhone could mean an affordable prepaid option for Apple's marquee device.
Even larger carriers such as Verizon can't ignore prepaid, given the need to keep customer growth humming. Sprint, which has been aggressive in prepaid with its Virgin Mobile and Boost Mobile lines, was seen as the biggest potential loser of the T-Mobile-MetroPCS marriage.

Using Google Wallet to pay for a cab ride was complicated and awkward.
(Credit: Roger Cheng/CNET) Funny Photos
Mobile payments whiff again
Next year is the year for mobile payments, really! Yeah, that line has only been uttered a few times over the past several years, and so far, we've got a few limited launches.
Google continues to have the most visible initiative out there, and it hasn't really taken too many people by storm, despite seeding the capability and Google Wallet out to its Nexus smartphones. Isis, the joint venture between AT&T, Verizon Wireless, and T-Mobile, just started its trials last month, and there are no signs when it'll move beyond that. The deal between Starbucks and Square seems interesting, but for now, it's largely Square processing Starbucks payments and not fully utilizing the advantages of full mobile payments.
Mobile payments continue to be hampered by rival groups all with their own agendas, and some don't even feel it really addresses any real problems.
Apple, meanwhile, hasn't committed to the Near-Field Communication technology used by many of the mobile payment parties, and offers its PassBook as its take on a mobile wallet. Even then, the implementation has been limited and disappointing.
Apple, Samsung will dominate, but new entrants could mix things up
With the iPhone and, increasingly, the Galaxy S, brands coming with their own built-in hype machines, expect the two companies continue reaping in a majority of the profits. Companies such as HTC, LG, and Sony have struggled this year, and those struggles are expected to continue with few of them bringing out a product that really changes their circumstance.
HTC has the best shot with its Droid DNA, but it too lacks the resources to effectively compete against Apple and Samsung. Sony, LG, and a myriad of other companies are still looking for the right answers.
Next year could see some interesting new smartphones from Microsoft and Amazon, both long rumored to be building their own handsets. Google's Motorola Mobility unit is reportedly building an "X" flagship phone that will better compete with the iPhone and Galaxy S III.
(Credit: CNET)
Samsung and Apple reach a settlement
Let's file this one under the wishful thinking category. But I can't be the only one sick of writing and reading about patent lawsuits, right?
This one is (sadly) not looking so good, especially if Samsung is saying this.
Let's hope that the goodwill from the holidays carries through to Apple and Samsung's lawyers. But most likely, the hostilities will continue as both try to one-up each other in courts around the world.

Microsoft to Google: You're not 'serious' about business apps

Posted by Admin | Posted in


Google "has not yet shown they are truly serious," about the enterprise app business, general manager in Microsoft's business division Julia White told the New York Times. "From the outside, they are an advertising company."
Even though Google execs have made some recent noises about making inroads on Microsoft's business-applications turf, the software giant claims it's not breaking a sweat.
Google has increasingly beefed up its enterprise businesses, such as Google Apps and Google Cloud Services, which compete directly with Microsoft. Earlier this week, Google's head of enterprise Amit Singh announced to AllThingsD the company's goal of nabbing 90 percent ofMicrosoft Office users. But, according to Business Insider, only 4 percent of Google's revenue in 2011 came from its enterprise services, while 96 percent came from advertising.

Office, by comparison, is one of Microsoft's biggest moneymakers. The company
released Office 365 in June 2011, which gave users the option of using Office software in the cloud -- a clear shot across Google's bow.
White told the NYT that Office 365 is "on track to be our fastest-growing business." And in order for Google to be a serious competitor, it would have to "provide a quality enterprise experience" in areas like "privacy, data handling and security."
Microsoft, however, apparently has yet to see much revenue from Office 365. According to the Times, most users still prefer the company's older, more familiar Office software.

Prevent Facebook from automatically importing photos

Posted by Admin | Posted in


A few weeks ago, Facebook introduced the ability to sync photos taken on your iPhones, iPads, and Android phones to your Facebook account automatically. Jason Cipriani describes how to enable the feature in "Getting started with Facebook photo sync on Android, iPhone."
Your smartphone or tablet might prompt you to activate the service, which uploads via Wi-Fi or the cell network the most recent 20 photos taken with the device and all subsequent photos it takes. As Jason explains, the photos are stored in a private folder and aren't posted to your Facebook Timeline until you post them manually.
Also, Facebook promises not to use too much bandwidth or horsepower, allowing you to disable uploads via the cell network to avoid data charges, for example. Graham Cluley's post from earlier this month on Sophos's Naked Security blog explains how Facebook's photo-sync feature works.
As you can imagine, having all the photos taken by your phone or tablet uploaded to Facebook imperils your privacy and security. As MercuryNews.com's Brandon Bailey reported earlier this month, Facebook claims it will not use the data associated with the photos until they are posted.

Facebook's automatic photo syncing is not activated by default, but you may have enabled the feature without realizing you were doing so. Last week I was contacted by a reader who had done just that: somehow his iPhone photos were being uploaded to his Facebook account. He didn't remember activating the option and couldn't figure out how to disable it.
However, all the data associated with the photos, including where and when they were taken, is still accessible to Facebook and can be used to determine the ads you see. Privacy advocates have pointed out that Facebook users are much more likely to post photos that are already uploaded, often inadvertently.
Facebook iPhone app Photo Sync settings
Change the Facebook app's Photo Sync settings to "Don't sync my photos" to prevent Facebook from automatically uploading all the photos you take with your iPhone.
(Credit: Screenshot by Dennis O'Reilly/CNET)
Even if you knowingly signed up for Facebook's photo syncs and are now having second thoughts, you'll be glad to learn that disabling Facebook's automatic photo uploads from your iPhone, iPad, or Android device takes only a couple of seconds.
The Facebook Help Center provides step-by-step instructions for disabling Photo Sync on Android phones, iPhones, and iPads from within the Facebook app itself. Here's the nutshell version:
Android: Press the main menu in the top-left corner and choose Account > App Settings > Sync Photos > Don't sync my photos.
iPhone and iPad: From the Timeline, press Photos > Sync, then the gear icon in the top-right corner, and finally Turn off Photo Sync (this step may not be necessary) > Don't sync my photos > Done.
You can also disable Facebook photo and video sharing via the iPhone's Settings app: open Settings, choose Privacy > Photos, and toggle the Facebook setting to Off. Now when you press Photo in the Facebook app you'll be prompted to re-enable photo and video sharing by changing the iPhone privacy setting back to On.
In a post from last September, Jason Cipriani described Facebook's tighter integration with iOS 6.
A quick look at the new Facebook privacy options
More of Facebook's growing pains were exhibited by founding sister Randi Zuckerberg's plea for "human decency" after one of her private photos was made public via a tweet by the sister of one of Ms. Zuckerberg's friends. CNET's Chris Matyszczyk reports on the flap in yesterday's post on the Technically Incorrect blog.
Ask permission before sharing? Isn't that contrary to Facebook's very nature? It makes more sense to require your explicit permission before anyone would be able to share anything you have designated as private.
What's needed is a way for Facebook users to post items with a restriction that says "This is for you to see, not to share." Unfortunately, no such option is included in the latest iteration of the ever-changing Facebook privacy settings.
Much was made of Facebook's recent revamp of its security settings. The only constant is that the current Facebook privacy settings are as difficult to make sense of as their predecessors.
A lock icon now appears in the upper-right corner of the main Facebook screen. Click it to view shortcuts to three privacy settings: "Who can see my stuff?", "Who can contact me?", and "How do I stop someone from bothering me?" Below these shortcuts is a link to the Privacy Settings page, which you can also access by clicking the gear icon next to the lock icon and choosing Privacy Settings.
Apart from a few interface changes, the Facebook privacy options haven't changed much since I described them in a post from last July, "Five-minute Facebook security checkup."
Click Timeline and Tagging in the left pane to view options for limiting access to your Timeline and controlling who views posts you're tagged in. All of your options are limited, however. For example, click Edit next to "Review posts friends tag you in before they appear on your Timeline?" to enable Timeline Review, which requires your manual approval of each post you're tagged in. The setting affects only your Timeline, not everyone else's.
Facebook Timeline and Tagging options
You can require your explicit approval before posts friends tag you in appear on your Timeline, but not before the posts appear elsewhere.
(Credit: Screenshot by Dennis O'Reilly/CNET)
Likewise, you can review tags friends add to your posts before they appear by clicking Edit next to that option in the tagging section of the page. The other two tagging options let you limit who else sees the posts you're tagged in, and who sees tag suggestions generated by Facebook's facial-recognition feature.

Convenient iTunes 11 keyboard shortcuts

Posted by Admin | Posted in


Beyond the basic arrow key navigation and space bar to start and stop song playback, there are a few other keyboard shortcuts in iTunes 11 that can be used to help you navigate its features.


Since the release of iTunes 11, a few convenient keyboard shortcuts have been revealed that offer quick ways to manage playback, navigate the windows, or otherwise deal with some of iTunes' common functions. As with most programs, various shortcuts can be found in the application's menus. However, along with these there are some hidden options that may prove convenient.
Clear play queue
When playing songs in iTunes, we often use the space bar to play and pause a song; however, this does not fully stop playback of the songs in queue. Instead, it functions as a pause command -- when you press the space bar again, the song resumes where it left off. If you would like to stop the playback of the current song in the play queue you can "cancel" it by using the common "Command-period" keyboard shortcut for cancel operations in OS X. A variation on this is to press the space bar followed by the right-arrow key to select the next song without playing it.
Select sections in iTunes
iTunes organizes content into Music, Movies, TV Shows, Books, Apps, and other categories based on what you have purchased from the iTunes store or what you have added to your library. You can select these areas of iTunes by holding the Command key and then typing a corresponding number key:
  • Command-1 = Music
  • Command-2 = Movies
  • Command-3 = TV shows
  • Command-4 = Podcasts
  • Command-5 = iTunes U
  • Command-6 = Books
  • Command-7 = Apps
Adding songs to Up-Next
One of the changes in iTunes 11 is the "Up Next" feature. If you hold the Option key down, a plus button will appear next to the song under your mouse cursor. If clicked, this will put the song in the Up-Next queue. In addition you can simply press Option-Enter to add a selected song to the queue. This is convenient if you are searching and browsing your library with the arrow keys.
Unfortunately this feature does not work with multiple file selections. If you select more than one song and press the Option key, they will all show a plus button; however, if you then press Option-Enter or click the plus button, only the first selection or that which you click will be added to the Up Next queue. This may be a bug in the program or an upcoming feature, but currently is not an implementation in iTunes 11.

Custom shortcuts
Enable keyboard control for "All controls"

By default, Apple offers keyboard support only for interactive controls such as text boxes and buttons. However, you can enable keyboard commands for all controls by pressing Control-F7 or selecting the "All Controls" radio button in the Keyboard system preferences. This allows you to tab through various toolbar and window elements and activate them with the space bar. In iTunes, this enables you to tab through the play and fast-forward buttons, the volume control, the Up Next menu, and the sidebar and its menus, among other window elements.
While these built-in options are useful in iTunes, you can also assign custom shortcuts to various menu items in iTunes for frequently used controls that do not have a default shortcut. This can be done for any application using the "Keyboard Shortcuts" tab in the OS X Keyboard system preferences.

Instagram to start sharing user data with Facebook

Posted by Admin | Posted in



Instagram, the photo-sharing service that Facebook bought out this year, is changing its privacy policy to allow it to share user data with its new corporate overlord.
The company said today in a blog update that the changes will go into effect on January 16, and won't alter how it handles photo ownership or who is able to see a user's pictures. But the updated privacy policy will allow Instagram to share user information with its corporate overlord, Facebook.
"This means we can do things like fight spam more effectively, detect system and reliability problems more quickly, and build better features for everyone by understanding how Instagram is used," Instagram wrote today on its blog.

Such affiliates, Instagram says, can offer their "own services (including providing you with better and more relevant experiences)." This mostly likely means one main thing: Advertising! Instagram also separately notes that it "may" (translation: will almost certainly) share user data with third-party advertisers.
One key change, however: Instagram's new policy specifically authorizes the sharing of user data with "Affiliates," which it describes as "businesses that are legally part of the same group of companies that Instagram is part of, or that become part of that group" -- i.e., Facebook and its family of businesses.
Facebook announced earlier this year that it would acquire Instagram for $1 billion, and closed the deal in September. At that time, Instagram announced that over 5 billion photos had been shared across its network.

Posted by Admin | Posted in


Pocket (free)

Pocket (free)
Scroll RightScroll Left
  • Pocket (free)
  • SwiftKey ($3.99)
  • Wunderlist (free)
  • Evernote (free)
  • Google Drive (free)
  • Google+ (free)
  • Snapseed (free)
  • TuneIn Radio Pro (99 cents)
  • Pandora for Android (free)
  • Air Patriots (free)
  • Angry Birds Star Wars (free)
  • Modern Combat 4: Zero Hour ($6.99)
If you're looking for a bookmark manager that syncs across different devices and different platforms, then look no further than Pocket. Better than Instapaper and other competitors, Pocket is hands-down the best app in the category.